Home
Jim Forest's Journal
 
[Most Recent Entries] [Calendar View] [Friends]

Below are the 5 most recent journal entries recorded in Jim Forest's LiveJournal:

    Sunday, January 14th, 2007
    3:46 pm
    136 weeks without a posting
    My last entry to this blog, my friend Steve Hayes has pointed out, was made 136 weeks ago. Part of the reason for such an extended silence is that I've had to deal with worsening kidney illness these past two or three years, which a year ago reached the point of requiring dialysis (use of of artificial kidney). Three times a week I am at a nearby dialysis clinic. It's a time-consuming process that has reduced by twelve hours a week the time available for writing.

    For some reflections on illness, if you have time and the inclination, see this draft chapter from my pilgrimage book:

    http://incommunion.org/forest-flier/jimsessays/the-pilgrimage-of-illness/

    And here's a photo of me at the dialysis clinic:

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/jimforest/91857028/in/set-151995/

    What writing time I have left I use for books I'm working on. I just finished a book with the working title "The Road to Emmaus: Pilgrimage as a Way of Life." Also I've lately completed two children's books, one about Mother Maria Skobtsova, the other about Sr. George, battler of dragons. In addition I continue to do some magazine writing, lots of correspondence, and to edit the quarterly journal, In Communion.

    No time for blogging.

    I would altogether close down this blog site if I knew how, but at least there is this note to explain the absence of fresh entries.

    Jim

    * * *
    Jim & Nancy Forest
    Kanisstraat 5
    1811 GJ Alkmaar
    The Netherlands
    jhforest(at)gmail.com
    personal web site: www.incommunion.org/forest-flier/
    Forest-Flier Editorial Services web site: www.incommunion.org/forest-flier/ffes/
    In Communion web site: www.incommunion.org
    photo web site: www.flickr.com/photos/jimforest/sets/
    * * *
    Wednesday, June 2nd, 2004
    12:10 pm
    Back home from Oxford
    We're home again after five good days in Oxford for the annual Sourozh
    Diocesan Conference, the first since Metropolitan Anthony's death last
    summer. Good lectures and workshops and many good conversations, not
    to mention walks in nearby parks, book shopping, etc. We stayed with
    Jessica Rose. There was also a visit with Bishop Kallistos.

    On Monday, after the conference ended, we went to Cookham, a village
    on the Thames southeast of Oxford, to visit the house (now a museum) of
    the artist Stanley Spencer -- you might look at their web site:

    http://www.cookham.com/about/spencer.htm

    A great deal of Spencer's work is at the Tate in London; see:

    http://www.tate.org.uk/servlet/ArtistWorks?cgroupid=999999961&artistid=1977

    Jim

    PS The lecture I gave at the conference is now on the OPF web site; see:

    http://www.incommunion.org/Sourozh2004.htm

    * * *
    Wednesday, May 19th, 2004
    6:29 pm
    Metropolitan Anthony Bloom's memories of Mother Maria
    While continuing to work on a lecture about Metropolitan Anthony, I came upon the attached interview with him in which he recalls Mother Maria Skobtsova and others associated with her.

    Jim

    * * *
     Mother Maria photo
    I did not know Mother Maria very well personally, that is, I met her, I saw her, I heard her speak, but I did not have a personal acquaintance with her, so I can only remember some very short episodes.

    The first thing I remember was that, as is well known, she was twice married and by her first marriage she had a daughter Gayana. She was in the Movement, in the seniors, when I was in the juniors. Her father, Kuzmin-Karavaev, became a Jesuit. And she would joke, saying: 'What a strange family I have, my father is a Jesuit and my mother an Orthodox nun.' I remember her only by sight, but I cannot describe her, I somehow see how she walked, but that was in any case very many years ago. So that was my first impression of that group of people.

    My second impression of Mother Maria was when she was not yet a nun. That was in the Sergiev Hostel. I do not remember how I came there, when she spoke on some subject. But she spoke with great enthusiasm and fire. This struck me, because I found that in her enthusiasm there was too much fire. I was quieter then. There was the feeling that she always spoke from deep conviction. From that period I was told that she went to the steel foundry in Creusot, where a large number of Russian soldiers and officers were working. She came there, she was not yet a nun, and announced that she was preparing to give a series of lectures on Dostoevsky. She was met with general howling: 'We do not need Dostoevsky, we need linen ironed, we need our rooms cleaned, we need our clothes mended, and you bring us Dostoevsky!' And she answered: 'Fine, if that is needed, let us leave Dostoevsky alone.' And for several days she cleaned rooms, sewed, mended, ironed, cleaned. When she had finished doing all that, they asked her to talk about Dostoevsky. This made a big impression on me, because she did not say: 'I did not come here to iron for you or clean your rooms --- can you not do that yourselves?' She responded immediately and in this way she won the hearts and minds of the people. This was my second impression of her.

    The third impression relates to the period when she had already become a nun. She was a very unusual nun in her behaviour and her manners. I was simply staggered when I saw her for the first time in monastic clothes. I was walking along the Boulevard Montparnasse and I saw: in front of a cafe, on the pavement, there was a table, on the table was a glass of beer and behind the glass was sitting a Russian nun in full monastic robes. I looked at her and decided that I would never go near that woman. I was young then and held extreme views.

    Then I learned something different about her. At that time she opened a hostel in Rue Lourmel, where some remarkable people were gathered. There was Fyodor Timofeevich Pyanov.

    MF: Ilya Fundaminski?

    MA: Yes, Father Dimitri Klepinin and ...

    MF: Fedotov, certainly.

    MA: Fedotov was around, and Mochulski played a very important part. And they gathered together all those who needed assistance. They did not ask whether you were innocent or guilty, why you were living such a life.

    Mother Mary went through the most dangerous and dubious streets of Paris, entered those guest houses where other people were simply afraid to go, found out whether there were Russians there, took them out of that place -- beggars and drunkards, took them to Rue Lourmel, washed, clothed and fed them and for some time they lived there. But then they went away again, went back to their previous situation, because their poverty and living conditions were such that it was very difficult to hold out, when you had lost everything and taken only a short rest. And she would then again return to the same place, bring them back, again wash them, dress them and feed them, and so years passed like this. And Mochulski took part in this work with her, although he was not concerned with the physical work, but immersed them in his culture. He was also a Dostoevsky specialist. But he did not teach them Dostoevsky, but simply Russian culture and tried to awaken in them some interest in life, which would draw them away from drink or unemployment.

    MF: When was that, was it in the thirties?

    MA: It was in the late twenties -- early thirties

    MF: It was a terrible time; even the French went hungry.

    MA: Even the French went hungry, but Russians even more so, because apart from anything else they were foreigners. We did not have passports: in 1925 we lost our Russian citizenship, and they did not give us a new one, we had the 'Nansen passport', which essentially did not give us any rights, except that we had a civil identity. But we could not move, could not travel with it.

    MF: And were there any priests at Rue Lourmel?

    MA: Besides Father Dimitri, who was there constantly and worked inseparably with his wife Tamara, I think Father Kern9 was there10.

    MF: Was he apparently the abbot there?

    MA: Possibly, I do not remember. I am not sure of it.

    MF: I was once in Paris at one of the meetings, and the organisers arranged a car for me at the station. A very good, nice woman took us in the car and when we talked, I learned that she, it turned out, was the daughter of Father Dmitri Klepinin. She was certainly quite young when he died; he perished in Buchenwald.

    MA: He was a very fine man, a simple, uncomplicated man, with a pure heart, pure thoughts, a pure life, who wanted good things and did good deeds.

    MF: And what was Mother Mary's reputation in Paris? How did Orthodox public opinion take her?

    MA: On the one hand, they praised her very much for her social work.

    MF: For her exploits.

    MA: Yes. On the other hand, she was somewhat eccentric. And for that reason some people regarded her in a positive light, while other looked at her in a negative light.

    MF: Can one not say that her 'eccentricity' was a manifestation of the intellectual side of her character? Because she was very unusual and came from completely irreligious, lay circles.

    MA: Yes, if you read, for example, her poetry. It is very lively, but in it are some very unusual passages, which you do not expect, not because they offend any feeling of yours, but because if you think that this is a nun, it is strange -- why did she write this poetry?

    MF: If you imagine her as an heiress of the St Petersburg circles and generally of that whole Silver Age movement, then maybe she was in her right place, but in a new dress?

    MA: I think she was in her right place, but would be an eccentric even in Russia. I remember, when she had not yet become a nun and somebody standing next to her raised an objection to her, she seized this person by the shoulders and shook him in front of everyone. Not every lecturer relates so hotly to his lecture.

    MF: It is interesting to know that there are such strange people, who are suitable not only for exploits, but also for martyrdom in spite of everything.

    MA: There are various rumours about her death. I had a letter from a Frenchwoman, who was with her in the Ravensburg concentration camp. I received all Mother Mary's papers and gave everything to Father Serge [Hackel]. This woman wrote that the Germans assembled them one day and called out the names of those who had to go to the gas chambers for asphyxiation and among them was a young woman, who struggled and cried, and Mother Mary, whom they did not call out, stepped forward out of the ranks and said to her: 'Do not struggle, it is not terrible and I can show you that -- I shall go with you'. And she, as an extra person, went to her death. A witness wrote this to me. Even now witnesses do not always clearly understand. Father Serge has another witness account. In any case, she freely gave up her life for others. She hid Jews in Paris. When the Germans came to arrest her, they did not find her, but found her son, Yuri. They arrested him and left her a note saying that if she came, they would release Yuri -- she came, but they did not release Yuri, and he also died there in the concentration camp.

    MF: And is there any veneration of her as a martyr in the Russian Church?

    MA: There was talk of canonisation, there were even articles in Russian newspapers about this. I have not heard that they in fact canonised her, but there was talk of it and I think that she was no less a martyr than others who were arrested in Russia for the faith or for Church activities. She did not die for the faith in the sense of confession of faith, dogma, but for the fact that she lived according to the faith with readiness to give all of herself, unto death, moreover not only when she died, because you imagine how much hunger and cold there was at Rue Lourmel and how crowded it was. That house was overflowing with those needing constant support, assistance, food, clothing, whom it was necessary to wash, comfort, give new hope to, so that sooner or later they would get out of those holes where they lived. She was all the same a cultured and refined woman, but she did not at all take that into account -- it was not a way of life she led at that time. She continued to write, she wrote both prose and poetry, but that was somehow another expression of what she did. Her faith consisted of action, she never taught anyone how to live, she just lived like that. I think that is about all I can remember about her.

    Recorded on 21 September 1999 Translated by John Phillips. Edited and annotated by Oleg Belyakov

    From the Cathedral Newsletter, Sourozh Diocese, London; issue of May 2001; the full text of past newsletters is posted on the diocesan web site: http://www.sourozh.org

    * * *

    pages related to Mother Maria Skobtsova and the other the newly canonized saints:

    www.incommunion.org/MariaIndex.htm

    * * *
    Tuesday, May 18th, 2004
    3:21 pm
    Metropolitan Anthony Bloom
    Nancy and I are gearing up for a trip to Oxford at the end of the month to take part in the annual conference of the Sourozh Diocese -- the Russian Orthodox Church in Great Britain and Ireland, the first suchj meeting since the death of Metropolitan Anthony. Nancy will be leading a workshop on the home as church and I have a talk to give on "Becoming the Gospel." The title refers to this sentence from Met. Anthony:

    "We should try to live in such a way that if the Gospels were lost, they could be re-written by looking at us."

    While at work drafting my lecture, I've found myself turning back to his several books as well as an archive of his sermons culled from the Sourozh Diocesan web site -- http://www.sourozh.org -- and came upon this passage which seemed to me worth sharing:

    "To be poor financially is in a way much easier than to be poor inwardly, to have no attachments. This is very difficult to learn and something which happens gradually, from year to year. You really learn to value things, to look at people and see the radiant beauty which they possess -- without the desire to possess them. To pluck a flower means to take possession of it, and it also means to kill it." (from an interview made by Timothy Wilson) first appeared in School for Prayer and was later reproduced as an introduction to The Essence of Prayer)

    Jim
    Sunday, May 16th, 2004
    9:12 pm
    newly recognized saints
    The extraordinary event of recent weeks in my life was the experience of taking part in the canonization of Mother Maria Skobtsova, Yuri Skobtsov, Fr Dimitri Klepinin and Elie Fondaminskii at the cathedral on rue Daru in Paris on Saturday night and Sunday morning, May 1st and 2nd. It was a second Pascha.

    Rather than try to describe it here, let me refer you impressions by Nancy that are web posted, along with some photos I took in the cathedral (having gotten a blessing to take pictures from the rector):

    http://www.incommunion.org/RueDaru.htm

    There is also an index page:

    http://www.incommunion.org/MariaIndex.htm

    with links to all sorts of things -- several icons of the newly glorified saints, a newly written essay about Fr Dimitri written by his daughter, Helene Arjakovsky-Klepinin, a biographical essay about Mother Maria Skobtsova, translations of several essays by her, a comprehensive Mother Maria bibliography, etc.

    Jim

    * * *
    Jim & Nancy Forest
    Kanisstraat 5 / 1811 GJ Alkmaar / The Netherlands
    Jim's e-mail: <jhforest@cs.com>
    Nancy's e-mail: <forestflier@cs.com>
    tel: ( 31-72) 511-2545 / fax: ( 31-72) 515-4180
    Orthodox Peace Fellowship web site: http://www.incommunion.org
    Jim & Nancy Forest web site: http://www.incommunion.org/home.htm
    * * *
Under the Forest-Flier Tree   About LiveJournal.com

Advertisement